Renewable energy needs attention on T&D front

 

The Union power minister has reportedly cautioned seven states—Karnataka, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu—that renewable energy developers could drag discoms of these states to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) over the non-payment of dues. It is learnt that these seven states together owe around Rs.5,300 crore to RE developers, and that the total outstanding of RE developers, pan India, is around Rs.8,200 crore.

Tariff-based bidding in wind energy to gain momentum

Tariff-based bidding in the wind energy sector is expected to pick up momentum in the coming months with both the Centre and states lining up major auctions.

The competitive tariff-based bidding mechanism in the wind industry, which was initiated earlier this year, is set to gain momentum. Tamil Nadu has become the first state to procure wind power using the reverse bidding process. The southern state is seeking long-term purchase of 500 mw, at a tariff not exceeding Rs.3.46 per kwh. Bidders can set up wind power projects of at least 25 mw in Tamil Nadu and the procurement agency Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd (Tangedco) will select the bidders based on the lowest tariff quoted. It may be mentioned that Tamil Nadu needs to procure 500 mw of wind energy to part-fulfil its RPO target of 9 per cent for FY18.

Tamil Nadu will thus be sourcing wind power at a competitive rate of Rs.3.46 per kwh, or lower. This would be much below the feed-in tariffs for wind that have traditionally been in the range of Rs.4 to Rs.6 per kwh. Tariff-based bidding is thus expected to create of war of tariffs in the wind industry as much as it did to the solar industry.

SECI auction sets benchmark

It may be recalled that in February this year, nodal agency Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) opened bids for 1 GW of wind power, heralding the tariff-based competitive bidding route for wind energy in India. Mytrah Energy, Green Infra Wind Energy, Inox Wind, Ostro Kutch Wind and Adani Green Energy emerged as the lowest bidders quoting Rs.3.46 per kwh. It may be noted that Tamil Nadu has used the same Rs.3.46 per kwh as the benchmark. SECI is also scheduled to procure another 1 GW of wind energy through the tariff-based bidding route and one can expect rates to be even more aggressive. The basic idea of such auctions is to help non-windy states meet their RPOs by procuring wind energy generated in windy states and transmitted through the ISTS (interstate transmission system).

More states

While Tamil Nadu is already in the market with its 500-mw procurement, states like Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh are believed to be lining up similar auctions. Though the quantum of their power purchase is yet unknown, these three states are expected to collectively mop up upwards of 1 GW from their auctions. Incidentally, Tamil Nadu is scheduled to open the techno-commercial bids for its 500-mw procurement drive on July 18, 2017.

India has set a renewable energy target of 175 GW by 2022 and wind accounts for 60 GW. As of March 2017, India’s wind energy capacity stood at around 32 GW with Tamil Nadu leading with a 27 per cent share, followed by Maharashtra, Gujarat and Rajasthan, each with a share of roughly 15 per cent. In the next five years, India needs to double its wind power installed capacity base and tariff-based auctions could help set up large-scale capacity, coupled with aggressive tariffs.

Also Read:

Tariff-based bidding: A game changer for wind energy

 

Electricity gains prominence in index of industrial production

The electricity sector has been given higher weight in the recently revised Index of Industrial Production series.

The Central Statistical Organisation (CSO), a body under the Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation (MOSPI), announced major changes to the Index of Industrial Production (IIP), on May 12, 2017. This article tries to discuss the subject in the context of the electricity sector.

The most important change has been the shifting of the base year from 2004-05 to a more recent year, 2011-12. Such shifting makes the calculation of the IIP more in tune with current economic dynamics. The other big change is the increase in the weight of the electricity sector (which means electricity generation) from the earlier 7.994 per cent to 10.316 per cent. The weight of a sector in the IIP broadly suggests its relative importance, measured in terms of value addition, in the overall industrial production. It is worth observing that electricity generation—largely an enabler of industrial production—is itself becoming an important contributor to industrial production.

Sectoral Weights in IIP
(per cent)

Sectoral

New Index
(Base: 2011-12)

Old Index
(Base: 2004-05)

Mining

14.373

14.157

Manufacturing

77.633

75.527

Electricity

7.994

10.316

Total

100.000

100.000

Another point worth noting is that “electricity generation” that was used in the calculation of the IIP till now, was based on only conventional sources—thermal, hydropower and nuclear. Henceforth, generation from renewable energy sources (e.g. wind, solar, biomass, small hydropower, waste-to-energy, etc) would also be taken into account.

Generation from renewable sources recorded an impressive year-on-year growth of 25.5 per cent in the first eleven months (April to February) of FY17, according to latest official statistics. Generation in the said period was 75,949 million kwh as against 60,513 million kwh in the April-February period of FY16. By the same comparison, growth in conventional electricity generation was 4.2 per cent. What is also worth mentioning is that the share of renewable energy generation in total electricity generation improved 6.7 per cent in the April-February period of FY17 from 5.6 per cent in FY16. More than the year-on-year growth rates, which may seem amplified by a low-base effect, it is the share in total electricity generation that reflects the growing importance of renewable energy (RE) generation.

Not the full series

A fine point that may be discussed here is that due to data limitations, the new IIP series has included RE generation with effect from April 2014 only. This means that the IIP series for electricity, for the years FY13 and FY14, are the same as the old series. Due to this “abrupt” inclusion of RE generation, the growth in the IIP for electricity for FY15 shows a spike of 14.8 per cent, as against 8.4 per cent measured by the old series. It may be mentioned here that since 2011-12 (or FY12) is the base year, the IIP for each of the months of that year is set as 100.

Growth in IIP for Electricity
(year-on-year % change)

Year

 

Old Index
(Base: 2004-05)

New Index
(Base: 2011-12)

2012-13

4.0

4.0

2013-14

6.1

6.1

2014-15

8.4

14.8

2015-16

5.7

5.7

2016-17

4.7

5.8

Significant change in perception

Due to the changes in the IIP composition, the perception of overall industrial growth has altered significantly. For instance, in FY17, industrial growth as suggested by the old IIP was a depressed 0.7 per cent. Now, growth measured as per new IIP series, is a much more respectable 5 per cent. Also, in FY14, industrial production was believed to have shrunk by 0.1 per cent based on the understanding derived from the old IIP series. Thanks to the revised series, industrial growth in that year stands at a commendable 3.4 per cent.

Contribution of electricity

Based on the revised series, the overall IIP grew by 5.0 per cent in FY17 as compared with 3.4 per cent in FY16.  By the same comparison, the IIP for electricity was up only marginally from 5.7 per cent in FY16 to 5.8 per cent in FY17. Though the growth in electricity generation was rather flat, the electricity sector made a higher contribution to growth in overall industrial production during FY17. This contribution stood at around 20 per cent in FY17 as against 14 per cent in FY16.